↓ Skip to main content

Development of a Geriatric Prognostic Scoring System for Predicting Survival After Surgery for Elderly Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Development of a Geriatric Prognostic Scoring System for Predicting Survival After Surgery for Elderly Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2019
DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07687-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Yamasaki, Yoshihiro Maekawa, Ken Sugimoto, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Toshio Ogihara, Ayumi Shintani, Hiromi Rakugi, Masaki Mori, Yuichiro Doki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,518,063
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,743
of 6,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,126
of 345,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#62
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.