You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of interventions including provision of personalised cancer risk information on accuracy of risk perception and psychological responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient Education & Counseling, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Max Bayne, Madi Fairey, Barbora Silarova, Simon J. Griffin, Stephen J. Sharp, William M.P. Klein, Stephen Sutton, Juliet A. Usher-Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Psychology | 8 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,073,225
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#535
of 4,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,446
of 355,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#8
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.