↓ Skip to main content

Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image classification

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cancer (1965), August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image classification
Published in
European Journal of Cancer (1965), August 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 381 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 10%
Student > Master 33 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 7%
Researcher 18 5%
Lecturer 16 4%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 206 54%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 50 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 12%
Engineering 25 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Other 35 9%
Unknown 211 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2025.
All research outputs
#2,216,962
of 34,518,599 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#590
of 8,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,174
of 386,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#11
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.