Title |
Screening for posttraumatic stress disorder in ARDS survivors: validation of the Impact of Event Scale-6 (IES-6)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2553-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Megan M. Hosey, Jeannie-Marie S. Leoutsakos, Ximin Li, Victor D. Dinglas, O. Joseph Bienvenu, Ann M. Parker, Ramona O. Hopkins, Dale M. Needham, Karin J. Neufeld |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
Argentina | 4 | 6% |
Mexico | 4 | 6% |
Canada | 3 | 5% |
Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
Colombia | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 41 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 19% |
Scientists | 7 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 12% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Professor | 8 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 23% |
Unknown | 37 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 15% |
Psychology | 7 | 7% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 45 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,106,915
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#888
of 6,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,334
of 357,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#21
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.