| Title |
Tropical cyclone sensitivities to CO2 doubling: roles of atmospheric resolution, synoptic variability and background climate changes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Dynamics, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00382-019-04913-y |
| Authors |
Gabriel A. Vecchi, Thomas L. Delworth, Hiroyuki Murakami, Seth D. Underwood, Andrew T. Wittenberg, Fanrong Zeng, Wei Zhang, Jane W. Baldwin, Kieran T. Bhatia, William Cooke, Jie He, Sarah B. Kapnick, Thomas R. Knutson, Gabriele Villarini, Karin van der Wiel, Whit Anderson, V. Balaji, Jan–Huey Chen, Keith W. Dixon, Rich Gudgel, Lucas M. Harris, Liwei Jia, Nathaniel C. Johnson, Shian-Jiann Lin, Maofeng Liu, Ching Ho Justin Ng, Anthony Rosati, James A. Smith, Xiaosong Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Myanmar | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 71% |
| Scientists | 14 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 43 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 16% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2021.
All research outputs
#593,988
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#74
of 5,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,235
of 355,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#1
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.