You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ecological interventions to prevent and manage zoonotic pathogen spillover
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2018.0342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanne H. Sokolow, Nicole Nova, Kim M. Pepin, Alison J. Peel, Juliet R. C. Pulliam, Kezia Manlove, Paul C. Cross, Daniel J. Becker, Raina K. Plowright, Hamish McCallum, Giulio A. De Leo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 291 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 14% |
| Researcher | 42 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 15% |
| Unknown | 85 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 24% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 26 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 97 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#417,350
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#327
of 7,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,527
of 355,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#7
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.