↓ Skip to main content

Factors affecting MeHg bioaccumulation in stream biota: the role of dissolved organic carbon and diet

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Factors affecting MeHg bioaccumulation in stream biota: the role of dissolved organic carbon and diet
Published in
Ecotoxicology, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10646-019-02086-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah J. Broadley, Kathryn L. Cottingham, Nicholas A. Baer, Kathleen C. Weathers, Holly A. Ewing, Ramsa Chaves-Ulloa, Jessica Chickering, Adam M. Wilson, Jenisha Shrestha, Celia Y. Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,346,214
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#242
of 1,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,247
of 342,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.