↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological studies of effort-related decision making using mouse touchscreen procedures: effects of dopamine antagonism do not resemble reinforcer devaluation by removal of food restriction

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological studies of effort-related decision making using mouse touchscreen procedures: effects of dopamine antagonism do not resemble reinforcer devaluation by removal of food restriction
Published in
Psychopharmacology, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00213-019-05343-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jen-Hau Yang, Rose E. Presby, Adam A. Jarvie, Renee A. Rotolo, R. Holly Fitch, Mercè Correa, John D. Salamone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 24%
Neuroscience 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Engineering 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#13,134,836
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#3,902
of 5,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,162
of 345,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#16
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.