Title |
Antibiotic exposure and ‘response failure’ for subsequent respiratory tract infections: an observational cohort study of UK preschool children in primary care
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x705089 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Oliver van Hecke, Alice Fuller, Clare Bankhead, Sara Jenkins-Jones, Nick Francis, Michael Moore, Chris Butler, Kay Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 32 | 39% |
Spain | 10 | 12% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Antigua and Barbuda | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 30 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 51 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 20% |
Scientists | 13 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 28 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 27 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 832. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#21,702
of 25,248,299 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#14
of 4,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#404
of 349,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,248,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.