You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide association analysis of self-reported daytime sleepiness identifies 42 loci that suggest biological subtypes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-11456-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heming Wang, Jacqueline M. Lane, Samuel E. Jones, Hassan S. Dashti, Hanna M. Ollila, Andrew R. Wood, Vincent T. van Hees, Ben Brumpton, Bendik S. Winsvold, Katri Kantojärvi, Teemu Palviainen, Brian E. Cade, Tamar Sofer, Yanwei Song, Krunal Patel, Simon G. Anderson, David A. Bechtold, Jack Bowden, Richard Emsley, Simon D. Kyle, Max A. Little, Andrew S. Loudon, Frank A. J. L. Scheer, Shaun M. Purcell, Rebecca C. Richmond, Kai Spiegelhalder, Jessica Tyrrell, Xiaofeng Zhu, Christer Hublin, Jaakko A. Kaprio, Kati Kristiansson, Sonja Sulkava, Tiina Paunio, Kristian Hveem, Jonas B. Nielsen, Cristen J. Willer, John-Anker Zwart, Linn B. Strand, Timothy M. Frayling, David Ray, Deborah A. Lawlor, Martin K. Rutter, Michael N. Weedon, Susan Redline, Richa Saxena |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 155 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 57 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 9% |
| Finland | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Peru | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 92 | 59% |
| Scientists | 49 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 220 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 73 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 86 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#418,951
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#6,862
of 58,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,491
of 354,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#133
of 1,465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.