↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association analysis of self-reported daytime sleepiness identifies 42 loci that suggest biological subtypes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide association analysis of self-reported daytime sleepiness identifies 42 loci that suggest biological subtypes
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-11456-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heming Wang, Jacqueline M. Lane, Samuel E. Jones, Hassan S. Dashti, Hanna M. Ollila, Andrew R. Wood, Vincent T. van Hees, Ben Brumpton, Bendik S. Winsvold, Katri Kantojärvi, Teemu Palviainen, Brian E. Cade, Tamar Sofer, Yanwei Song, Krunal Patel, Simon G. Anderson, David A. Bechtold, Jack Bowden, Richard Emsley, Simon D. Kyle, Max A. Little, Andrew S. Loudon, Frank A. J. L. Scheer, Shaun M. Purcell, Rebecca C. Richmond, Kai Spiegelhalder, Jessica Tyrrell, Xiaofeng Zhu, Christer Hublin, Jaakko A. Kaprio, Kati Kristiansson, Sonja Sulkava, Tiina Paunio, Kristian Hveem, Jonas B. Nielsen, Cristen J. Willer, John-Anker Zwart, Linn B. Strand, Timothy M. Frayling, David Ray, Deborah A. Lawlor, Martin K. Rutter, Michael N. Weedon, Susan Redline, Richa Saxena

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 155 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 70 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Neuroscience 14 6%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 83 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#415,269
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#6,807
of 57,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,466
of 354,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#133
of 1,465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.