You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neural correlates of training and transfer effects in working memory in older adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeuroImage, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.068 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephan Heinzel, Robert C. Lorenz, Patricia Pelz, Andreas Heinz, Henrik Walter, Norbert Kathmann, Michael A. Rapp, Christine Stelzel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 59 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 37 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#9,192
of 12,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,391
of 318,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#154
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.