↓ Skip to main content

Systematic outperformance of 112 dermatologists in multiclass skin cancer image classification by convolutional neural networks

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cancer (1965), August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systematic outperformance of 112 dermatologists in multiclass skin cancer image classification by convolutional neural networks
Published in
European Journal of Cancer (1965), August 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roman C. Maron, Michael Weichenthal, Jochen S. Utikal, Achim Hekler, Carola Berking, Axel Hauschild, Alexander H. Enk, Sebastian Haferkamp, Joachim Klode, Dirk Schadendorf, Philipp Jansen, Tim Holland-Letz, Bastian Schilling, Christof von Kalle, Stefan Fröhling, Maria R. Gaiser, Daniela Hartmann, Anja Gesierich, Katharina C. Kähler, Ulrike Wehkamp, Ante Karoglan, Claudia Bär, Titus J. Brinker, Collabrators, Laurenz Schmitt, Wiebke K. Peitsch, Friederike Hoffmann, Jürgen C. Becker, Christina Drusio, Philipp Jansen, Joachim Klode, Georg Lodde, Stefanie Sammet, Dirk Schadendorf, Wiebke Sondermann, Selma Ugurel, Jeannine Zader, Alexander Enk, Martin Salzmann, Sarah Schäfer, Knut Schäkel, Julia Winkler, Priscilla Wölbing, Hiba Asper, Ann-Sophie Bohne, Victoria Brown, Bianca Burba, Sophia Deffaa, Cecilia Dietrich, Matthias Dietrich, Katharina Antonia Drerup, Friederike Egberts, Anna-Sophie Erkens, Salim Greven, Viola Harde, Marion Jost, Merit Kaeding, Katharina Kosova, Stephan Lischner, Maria Maagk, Anna Laetitia Messinger, Malte Metzner, Rogina Motamedi, Ann-Christine Rosenthal, Ulrich Seidl, Jana Stemmermann, Kaspar Torz, Juliana Giraldo Velez, Jennifer Haiduk, Mareike Alter, Claudia Bär, Paul Bergenthal, Anne Gerlach, Christian Holtorf, Ante Karoglan, Sophie Kindermann, Luise Kraas, Moritz Felcht, Maria R. Gaiser, Claus-Detlev Klemke, Hjalmar Kurzen, Thomas Leibing, Verena Müller, Raphael R. Reinhard, Jochen Utikal, Franziska Winter, Carola Berking, Laurie Eicher, Daniela Hartmann, Markus Heppt, Katharina Kilian, Sebastian Krammer, Diana Lill, Anne-Charlotte Niesert, Eva Oppel, Elke Sattler, Sonja Senner, Jens Wallmichrath, Hans Wolff, Tina Giner, Valerie Glutsch, Andreas Kerstan, Dagmar Presser, Philipp Schrüfer, Patrick Schummer, Ina Stolze, Judith Weber, Konstantin Drexler, Sebastian Haferkamp, Marion Mickler, Camila Toledo Stauner, Alexander Thiem

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 240 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Master 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Researcher 17 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 7 3%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 118 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 46 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 15%
Engineering 16 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 124 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#10,404,105
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#4,022
of 8,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,408
of 383,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#33
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.