| Title |
Status and potential of bacterial genomics for public health practice: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0930-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nina Van Goethem, Tine Descamps, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Nancy H. C. Roosens, Nele A. M. Boon, Herman Van Oyen, Annie Robert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Colombia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,594,984
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,249
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,867
of 342,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#20
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.