| Title |
Thoracic ultrasonography: a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05725-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. H. Mayo, R. Copetti, D. Feller-Kopman, G. Mathis, E. Maury, S. Mongodi, F. Mojoli, G. Volpicelli, M. Zanobetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 386 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 38 | 10% |
| Mexico | 34 | 9% |
| United States | 27 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 6% |
| Colombia | 13 | 3% |
| Italy | 11 | 3% |
| France | 10 | 3% |
| Argentina | 10 | 3% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 74 | 19% |
| Unknown | 139 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 282 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 65 | 17% |
| Scientists | 29 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 309 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 40 | 13% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Researcher | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 70 | 23% |
| Unknown | 88 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 170 | 55% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 105 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 237. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#161,441
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#113
of 5,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,015
of 356,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.