↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of the medical response to November 2015 Paris terrorist attacks: resource utilization according to the cause of injury

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
72 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of the medical response to November 2015 Paris terrorist attacks: resource utilization according to the cause of injury
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00134-019-05724-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathieu Raux, Pierre Carli, Frédéric Lapostolle, Matthieu Langlois, Youri Yordanov, Anne-Laure Féral-Pierssens, Alexandre Woloch, Carl Ogereau, Etienne Gayat, Arié Attias, Dominique Pateron, Yves Castier, Anne François, Bertrand Ludes, Emmanuelle Dolla, Jean-Pierre Tourtier, Bruno Riou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Other 9 13%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 24 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 26 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2020.
All research outputs
#755,662
of 25,398,331 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#704
of 5,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,011
of 352,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#22
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,398,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.