↓ Skip to main content

Wandering spiders recover more slowly than web-building spiders after fire

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Wandering spiders recover more slowly than web-building spiders after fire
Published in
Oecologia, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00442-019-04471-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inam Yekwayo, James S. Pryke, René Gaigher, Michael J. Samways

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 46%
Environmental Science 5 19%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#4,453
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,301
of 362,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#45
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.