Title |
Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2005
|
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sune Rubak, Annelli Sandbaek, Torsten Lauritzen, Bo Christensen |
Abstract |
Motivational Interviewing is a well-known, scientifically tested method of counselling clients developed by Miller and Rollnick and viewed as a useful intervention strategy in the treatment of lifestyle problems and disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 38% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 8% |
India | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Scientists | 4 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,981 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 21 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 15 | <1% |
Australia | 10 | <1% |
Canada | 4 | <1% |
Norway | 2 | <1% |
Argentina | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | <1% |
Unknown | 1916 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 413 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 314 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 209 | 11% |
Researcher | 172 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 126 | 6% |
Other | 355 | 18% |
Unknown | 392 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 431 | 22% |
Psychology | 409 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 231 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 141 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 3% |
Other | 246 | 12% |
Unknown | 457 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#300,871
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#108
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308
of 74,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them