| Title |
An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used to treat skin diseases in northern Pakistan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12906-019-2605-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Khafsa Malik, Mushtaq Ahmad, Muhammad Zafar, Riaz Ullah, Hafiz Majid Mahmood, Bushra Parveen, Neelam Rashid, Shazia Sultana, Syed Nasar Shah, Lubna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 98 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 107 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2022.
All research outputs
#17,812,370
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,356
of 3,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,573
of 341,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#50
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.