↓ Skip to main content

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status in Relation to Serum Biomarkers in the Black Women’s Health Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status in Relation to Serum Biomarkers in the Black Women’s Health Study
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11524-016-0034-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvette C. Cozier, Michelle A. Albert, Nelsy Castro-Webb, Patricia F. Coogan, Paul Ridker, Harvey W. Kaufman, Julie R. Palmer, Lynn Rosenberg

Abstract

Lower neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Black women have a higher CVD risk and are more likely to live in poor neighborhoods than white women. We examined the association of neighborhood SES with several CVD biomarkers using data from the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS), a follow-up study of US black women reporting high levels of education and income. Blood specimens of 418 BWHS participants were assayed for C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin A1C (hgA1C), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. US Census block group data were linked to the women's addresses to reflect neighborhood SES. Multivariable-adjusted mixed linear regression models that adjusted for person-level SES and for cardiovascular risk factors were used to assess CRP, hgA1C, and HDL levels in relation to quintiles of neighborhood SES. Women living in the poorest neighborhoods had the least favorable biomarker levels. As neighborhood SES increased, CRP decreased (P for trend = 0.01), hgA1C decreased (P for trend = 0.07), and HDL increased (P for trend = 0.19). These associations were present within strata of individual educational level. The present findings suggest that neighborhood environments may affect physiological processes within residents independently of individual SES.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 25%
Social Sciences 10 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Psychology 5 8%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2016.
All research outputs
#5,756,433
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#590
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,284
of 299,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.