↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation reconstructed from trans-Pacific tree rings: 1350–2004 CE

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation reconstructed from trans-Pacific tree rings: 1350–2004 CE
Published in
Climate Dynamics, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04928-5
Authors

Brendan M. Buckley, C. C. Ummenhofer, R. D. D’Arrigo, K. G. Hansen, L. H. Truong, C. N. Le, D. K. Stahle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,576,667
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#3,481
of 4,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,711
of 312,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#43
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.