↓ Skip to main content

Cross-cultural and cross-ecotype production of a killer whale ‘excitement’ call suggests universality

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cross-cultural and cross-ecotype production of a killer whale ‘excitement’ call suggests universality
Published in
The Science of Nature, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00114-010-0732-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Rehn, Olga A. Filatova, John W. Durban, Andrew D. Foote

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Brazil 4 2%
Italy 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 152 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 19%
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 60%
Environmental Science 15 9%
Computer Science 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 26 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,558,832
of 24,318,236 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#773
of 2,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,657
of 104,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,318,236 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.