| Title |
Multidisciplinary investigations of the diets of two post-medieval populations from London using stable isotopes and microdebris analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-019-00910-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Madeleine Bleasdale, Paola Ponce, Anita Radini, Andrew S. Wilson, Sean Doherty, Patrick Daley, Chloe Brown, Luke Spindler, Lucy Sibun, Camilla Speller, Michelle M. Alexander |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 32% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 21 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 21 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,430,432
of 24,983,099 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#87
of 928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,633
of 318,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,983,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.