↓ Skip to main content

Does an adapted Dialectical Behaviour Therapy skills training programme result in positive outcomes for participants with a dual diagnosis? A mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 487)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
40 news outlets
twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Does an adapted Dialectical Behaviour Therapy skills training programme result in positive outcomes for participants with a dual diagnosis? A mixed methods study
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13722-019-0156-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Flynn, Mary Joyce, Ailbhe Spillane, Conal Wrigley, Paul Corcoran, Aoife Hayes, Marian Flynn, David Wyse, Barry Corkery, Brid Mooney

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 65 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Unspecified 4 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 65 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 320. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#105,229
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#8
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,960
of 352,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.