| Title |
Qigong in cancer care: a systematic review and construct analysis of effective Qigong therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-016-3201-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. J. Klein, Roger Schneider, C. J. Rhoads |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 14% |
| Psychology | 22 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 57 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,336,424
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#678
of 5,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,931
of 319,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#17
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.