↓ Skip to main content

Immune insufficiency during GVHD is due to defective antigen presentation within dendritic cell subsets

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immune insufficiency during GVHD is due to defective antigen presentation within dendritic cell subsets
Published in
Blood, March 2012
DOI 10.1182/blood-2011-12-398164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate A. Markey, Motoko Koyama, Rachel D. Kuns, Katie E. Lineburg, Yana A. Wilson, Stuart D. Olver, Neil C. Raffelt, Alistair L.J. Don, Antiopi Varelias, Renee J. Robb, Melody Cheong, Christian R. Engwerda, Raymond J. Steptoe, Hayley S. Ramshaw, Angel F. Lopez, Javier Vega-Ramos, Andrew M. Lew, Jose A. Villadangos, Geoffrey R. Hill, Kelli P.A. MacDonald

Abstract

Alloreactivity after transplantation is associated with profound immune suppression, and consequent opportunistic infection results in high morbidity and mortality. This immune suppression is most profound during GVHD after bone marrow transplantation where an inflammatory cytokine storm dominates. Contrary to current dogma, which avers that this is a T-cell defect, we demonstrate that the impairment lies within conventional dendritic cells (cDCs). Significantly, exogenous antigens can only be presented by the CD8(-) cDC subset after bone marrow transplantation, and inflammation during GVHD specifically renders the MHC class II presentation pathway in this population incompetent. In contrast, both classic and cross-presentation within MHC class I remain largely intact. Importantly, this defect in antigen processing can be partially reversed by TNF inhibition or the adoptive transfer of donor cDCs generated in the absence of inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 33%
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Master 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2012.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#27,196
of 33,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,702
of 169,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#213
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.