↓ Skip to main content

Integrating Molecular Testing in the Diagnosis and Management of Children with Thyroid Lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 457)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating Molecular Testing in the Diagnosis and Management of Children with Thyroid Lesions
Published in
Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, April 2016
DOI 10.2350/15-05-1638-oa.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leomar Y. Ballester, Stephen F. Sarabia, Hadi Sayeed, Nimesh Patel, Joshua Baalwa, Ioanna Athanassaki, Jose A. Hernandez, Erica Fang, Norma M. Quintanilla, Angshumoy Roy, Dolores H. López-Terrada

Abstract

Thyroid nodules occur in 1-2% of children and identifying which nodules are malignant is often challenging. Cytologic evaluation facilitates the diagnosis of thyroid lesions (TL) but in 10-40% of cases the interpretation is indeterminate. Patients with indeterminate diagnoses are often treated with hemi-thyroidectomy followed by completion thyroidectomy, if cancer is found in the initial specimen. Exposing patients to multiple surgeries increases costs and morbidity. The American Thyroid Association states that that a combination of molecular markers is likely to optimize the management of patients with indeterminate cytology. However, few studies have addressed the molecular alterations present in pediatric TL. Twenty-seven thyroid carcinomas from pediatric patients were tested for alterations common in adult TL including BRAF V600E mutation, RET fusions, and TERT promoter mutations. Mutation-negative cases were subsequently analyzed with a next generation sequencing (NGS) mutation panel to search for additional targets. Histologic diagnoses included 12 classic papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC), 13 follicular variant PTC, 1 medullary thyroid carcinoma, and 1 follicular carcinoma. Fourteen cases showed lymph node involvement and 13 cases demonstrated lymphovascular invasion. The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 10/27 cases, and RET fusions were detected in 6/27 cases. No TERT promoter mutations were identified in any of the cases. The NGS panel revealed additional RET and CTNNB1 pathogenic missense mutations. Our results demonstrate that molecular abnormalities are common in pediatric TLs and suggest that incorporation of molecular testing will be helpful in optimizing patient management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,074,159
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric and Developmental Pathology
#37
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,735
of 300,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric and Developmental Pathology
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.