| Title |
Subsidizing PGD: The Moral Case for Funding Genetic Selection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11673-019-09932-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James M. Kemper, Christopher Gyngell, Julian Savulescu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Greece | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Russia | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 35% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,790,771
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#118
of 659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,026
of 347,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.