↓ Skip to main content

Tooth-brushing epilepsy with ictal orgasms

Overview of attention for article published in Seizure, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 2,735)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tooth-brushing epilepsy with ictal orgasms
Published in
Seizure, April 2004
DOI 10.1016/s1059-1311(03)00109-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

YAO-CHUNG CHUANG, TSU-KUNG LIN, CHUN-CHUNG LUI, SHANG-DER CHEN, CHEN-SHENG CHANG

Abstract

We report a 41-year-old woman with complex reflex epilepsy in which seizures were induced exclusively by the act of tooth brushing. All the attacks occurred with a specific sensation of sexual arousal and orgasm-like euphoria that were followed by a period of impairment of consciousness. Ictal EEG demonstrated two events of epileptic seizure that were provoked after tooth brushing for 38 and 14 seconds, respectively. The interictal EEG showed epileptiform discharges over the right anterior temporal region and interictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan showed relative hypoperfusion in the uncus of right temporal lobe. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed right hippocampal atrophy. We suggest that tooth-brushing epilepsy, especially with sexual ictal manifestations, may provide insight into the cerebral pathophysiology at the right temporolimbic structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Taiwan 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Psychology 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#522,882
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Seizure
#12
of 2,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#495
of 65,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seizure
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them