| Title |
Levosimendan in septic shock in patients with biochemical evidence of cardiac dysfunction: a subgroup analysis of the LeoPARDS randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05731-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David B. Antcliffe, Shalini Santhakumaran, Robert M. L. Orme, Josie K. Ward, Farah Al-Beidh, Kieran O’Dea, Gavin D. Perkins, Mervyn Singer, Daniel F. McAuley, Alexina J. Mason, Mary Cross, Deborah Ashby, Anthony C. Gordon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 32 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 35% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,725,629
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,496
of 5,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,441
of 343,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#65
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.