| Title |
Emerging scanning probe approaches to the measurement of ionic reactivity at energy storage materials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-016-9373-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zachary J. Barton, Joaquín Rodríguez-López |
| Abstract |
Many modern energy storage technologies operate via the nominally reversible shuttling of alkali ions between an anode and a cathode capable of hosting them. The degradation process that occurs with normal usage is not yet fully understood, but emerging progress in analytical tools may help address this knowledge gap. By interrogating ionic fluxes over electrified surfaces, scanning probe methods may identify features that impact the local cyclability of a material and subsequently help inform rational electrode design for future generations of batteries. Methods developed for identifying ion fluxes for batteries show great promise for broader applications, including biological interfaces, corrosion, and catalysis. Graphical Abstract Versatile ionics for next-generation batteries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 25% |
| Researcher | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 18 | 41% |
| Engineering | 5 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#7,542
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,514
of 312,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#77
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.