| Title |
Epigenetic loss of RNA-methyltransferase NSUN5 in glioma targets ribosomes to drive a stress adaptive translational program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-019-02062-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maxime Janin, Vanessa Ortiz-Barahona, Manuel Castro de Moura, Anna Martínez-Cardús, Pere Llinàs-Arias, Marta Soler, Daphna Nachmani, Joffrey Pelletier, Ulrike Schumann, Maria E. Calleja-Cervantes, Sebastian Moran, Sonia Guil, Alberto Bueno-Costa, David Piñeyro, Montserrat Perez-Salvia, Margalida Rosselló-Tortella, Laia Piqué, Joan J. Bech-Serra, Carolina De La Torre, August Vidal, María Martínez-Iniesta, Juan F. Martín-Tejera, Alberto Villanueva, Alexandra Arias, Isabel Cuartas, Ana M. Aransay, Andres Morales La Madrid, Angel M. Carcaboso, Vicente Santa-Maria, Jaume Mora, Agustin F. Fernandez, Mario F. Fraga, Iban Aldecoa, Leire Pedrosa, Francesc Graus, Noemi Vidal, Fina Martínez-Soler, Avelina Tortosa, Cristina Carrato, Carme Balañá, Matthew W. Boudreau, Paul J. Hergenrother, Peter Kötter, Karl-Dieter Entian, Jürgen Hench, Stephan Frank, Sheila Mansouri, Gelareh Zadeh, Pablo D. Dans, Modesto Orozco, George Thomas, Sandra Blanco, Joan Seoane, Thomas Preiss, Pier Paolo Pandolfi, Manel Esteller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 23 | 52% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 82% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#709,456
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#97
of 2,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,820
of 352,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.