↓ Skip to main content

Patient‐reported outcomes measure for children born preterm: validation of the SOLE VLBWI Questionnaire, a new quality of life self‐assessment tool

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient‐reported outcomes measure for children born preterm: validation of the SOLE VLBWI Questionnaire, a new quality of life self‐assessment tool
Published in
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, April 2016
DOI 10.1111/dmcn.13122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivana Olivieri, Stefania M Bova, Elisa Fazzi, Daniela Ricci, Francesca Tinelli, Cristina Montomoli, Cristiana Rezzani, Umberto Balottin, Simona Orcesi, The SOLE VLBWI Questionnaire Study Group

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop and validate a new self-report questionnaire for measuring quality of life (QoL), at school age, in children with a very low birthweight (VLBW). Through a focus group approach, children were involved directly in defining the questionnaire items, which were presented as illustrations rather than written questions. This preliminary validation of the questionnaire was conducted in 152 participants with VLBW (aged 7-11y) randomly selected from the five participating Italian centres. The questionnaire was completed by children and parents separately; data on children's demographic and medical history, and intellectual, adaptive, and behavioural functioning were collected using standardized scales. All the children also completed the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), another Italian-language measure of QoL in children. Our questionnaire was readily accepted and understood, and quick to complete. The Cronbach's alpha value showed it to be a reliable instrument. The child-compiled version correlated well with the PedsQL, whereas no correlations emerged with the other scales used, IQ, or degree of impairment. Conversely, these variables correlated significantly with the parent-compiled version. Children's and parents' answers were divergent on practically all the items. The results confirm the validity of the new instrument and highlight a poor overlap between parents' and children's perspectives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Other 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2016.
All research outputs
#21,938,746
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#3,891
of 4,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,852
of 305,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#53
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.