| Title |
Electroacupuncture for cervical ripening prior to labor induction: a randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00404-010-1526-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gisèle P. C. Gribel, Luis Guillermo Coca-Velarde, Renato A. Moreira de Sá |
| Abstract |
The present study was aimed to compare the effects of the use of electroacupuncture and misoprostol in inducing labor in patients with Bishop score < 7 and to observe the characteristics of labor in both methods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2012.
All research outputs
#13,331,378
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#959
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,541
of 98,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.