You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: Interrater variability in muscle biopsy reading.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neurology, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1212/wnl.0000000000008005 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pieter A Olivier, Boel De Paepe, Eleonora Aronica, Florieke Berfelo, Roos Colman, Anthony Amato, Dalia Dimitri, Eduard Gallardo, Romain Gherardi, Hans-Hilmar Goebel, David Hilton-Jones, Monika Hofer, Janice Holton, Henrik Daa Schrøder, Duygu Selcen, Werner Stenzel, Marianne de Visser, Jan L De Bleecker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 25% |
France | 1 | 25% |
Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 4 | 17% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 26% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 48% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 13% |
Psychology | 2 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#13,509,461
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#13,766
of 20,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,804
of 346,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#179
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.