You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Therapeutic Implications of Tea Polyphenols Against Dopamine (DA) Neuron Degeneration in Parkinson’s Disease (PD)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cells, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3390/cells8080911 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhi Dong Zhou, Shao Ping Xie, Wuan Ting Saw, Patrick Ghim Hoe Ho, Hongyan Wang, Zhou Lei, Zhao Yi, Eng King Tan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 10 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,854,225
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Cells
#736
of 10,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,434
of 319,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cells
#28
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.