| Title |
Isotropic majority-vote model on a square lattice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Statistical Physics, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01060069 |
| Authors |
M. J. de Oliveira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 42% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,847,865
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Physics
#137
of 1,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,380
of 62,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Physics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them