↓ Skip to main content

Coral recovery may not herald the return of fishes on damaged coral reefs

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Coral recovery may not herald the return of fishes on damaged coral reefs
Published in
Oecologia, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2306-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R. Bellwood, Andrew H. Baird, Martial Depczynski, Alonso González-Cabello, Andrew S. Hoey, Carine D. Lefèvre, Jennifer K. Tanner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 179 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 22%
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 42%
Environmental Science 46 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,508,406
of 23,776,941 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#406
of 4,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,404
of 162,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,776,941 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.