↓ Skip to main content

Population pharmacokinetics and probability of target attainment of meropenem in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Population pharmacokinetics and probability of target attainment of meropenem in critically ill patients
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00228-016-2053-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Mattioli, Carmen Fucile, Valerio Del Bono, Valeria Marini, Andrea Parisini, Alexandre Molin, Maria Laura Zuccoli, Giulia Milano, Romano Danesi, Anna Marchese, Marialuisa Polillo, Claudio Viscoli, Paolo Pelosi, Antonietta Martelli, Antonello Di Paolo

Abstract

Patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with Klebsiella pneumoniae infections are characterized by high mortality. The aims of the present study were to investigate the population pharmacokinetics parameters and to assess the probability of target attainment of meropenem in critically ill patients to provide information for more effective regimens. Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included in the study. Meropenem was administered as 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusions at doses of 1-2 g every 8 or 12 h. Meropenem plasma concentrations were measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and a population pharmacokinetics analysis was performed using NONMEM software. Meropenem plasma disposition was simulated for extended (3 h; 5 h) or continuous i.v. infusions, and the following parameters were calculated: time during which free drug concentrations were above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (fT > MIC), free minimum plasma concentrations above 4× MIC (fCmin > 4× MIC), probability of target attainment (PTA), and cumulative fraction of response (CFR). Gender and severity of sepsis affected meropenem clearance, whose typical population values ranged from 6.22 up to 12.04 L/h (mean ± standard deviation (SD) value, 9.38 ± 4.47 L/h). Mean C min value was 7.90 ± 7.91 mg/L, suggesting a high interindividual variability. The simulation confirmed that 88 and 97.5 % of patients achieved effective C min > 4× MIC values after 3- and 5-h i.v. infusions of meropenem 2 g × 3/day, respectively. On the contrary, the same total daily doses reached the target C min > 4× MIC values in 100 % of patients when administered as continuous i.v. infusions. Several factors may influence meropenem pharmacokinetics in ICU patients. Continuous i.v. infusions of meropenem seem to be more effective than standard regimens to achieve optimal therapeutic targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 32 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,832,709
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#2,248
of 2,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,160
of 302,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.