↓ Skip to main content

Connectivity: An emerging concept for physiotherapy practice

Overview of attention for article published in Physiotherapy Theory & Practice, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Connectivity: An emerging concept for physiotherapy practice
Published in
Physiotherapy Theory & Practice, April 2016
DOI 10.3109/09593985.2015.1137665
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A. Nicholls, Karen Atkinson, Wenche S. Bjorbækmo, Barbara E. Gibson, Julie Latchem, Jens Olesen, Jenny Ralls, Jennifer Setchell

Abstract

Having spent their first century anchored to a biomedical model of practice, physiotherapists have been increasingly interested in exploring new models and concepts that will better equip them for serving the health-care needs of 21st century clients/patients. Connectivity offers one such model. With an extensive philosophical background in phenomenology, symbolic interactionism, structuralism, and postmodern research, connectivity resists the prevailing western biomedical view that health professionals should aim to increase people's independence and autonomy, preferring instead to identify and amplify opportunities for collaboration and co-dependence. Connectivity critiques the normalization that underpins modern health care, arguing that our constant search for deviance is building stigma and discrimination into our everyday practice. It offers provocative opportunities for physiotherapists to rethink some of the fundamental tenets of their profession and better align physiotherapy with 21st century societal expectations. In this paper, we provide a background to the place connectivity may play in future health care, and most especially future physiotherapy practice. The paper examines some of the philosophical antecedents that have made connectivity an increasingly interesting and challenging concept in health care today.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 113 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 19%
Other 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 34 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Psychology 7 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 34 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,818,557
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Physiotherapy Theory & Practice
#431
of 1,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,604
of 316,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiotherapy Theory & Practice
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.