| Title |
Barriers and facilitators to uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Women's Health, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12905-019-0809-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleanor Black, Fran Hyslop, Robyn Richmond |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Uganda | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 341 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 13% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 11% |
| Unknown | 150 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 151 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,928,075
of 23,726,221 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#599
of 1,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,140
of 346,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,726,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.