↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of ferroptosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
patent
8 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1062 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
850 Mendeley
Title
Mechanisms of ferroptosis
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00018-016-2194-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Yinuo Cao, Scott J. Dixon

Abstract

Ferroptosis is a non-apoptotic form of cell death that can be triggered by small molecules or conditions that inhibit glutathione biosynthesis or the glutathione-dependent antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4). This lethal process is defined by the iron-dependent accumulation of lipid reactive oxygen species and depletion of plasma membrane polyunsaturated fatty acids. Cancer cells with high level RAS-RAF-MEK pathway activity or p53 expression may be sensitized to this process. Conversely, a number of small molecule inhibitors of ferroptosis have been identified, including ferrostatin-1 and liproxstatin-1, which can block pathological cell death events in brain, kidney and other tissues. Recent work has identified a number of genes required for ferroptosis, including those involved in lipid and amino acid metabolism. Outstanding questions include the relationship between ferroptosis and other forms of cell death, and whether activation or inhibition of ferroptosis can be exploited to achieve desirable therapeutic ends.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 850 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 844 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 145 17%
Student > Bachelor 112 13%
Student > Master 107 13%
Researcher 82 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 5%
Other 81 10%
Unknown 278 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 220 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 75 9%
Chemistry 41 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 35 4%
Other 88 10%
Unknown 305 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#883,902
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#69
of 5,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,466
of 318,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.