| Title |
A novel GC-MS methodology to evaluate aromatase activity in human placental microsomes: a comparative study with the standard radiometric assay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-019-02076-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tiago V. Augusto, Sara C. Cunha, Cristina Amaral, José O. Fernandes, Elisiário Tavares da Silva, Fernanda F. M. Roleira, Natércia Teixeira, Georgina Correia-da-Silva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 15% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,696
of 9,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,071
of 351,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#16
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.