You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping the Mobile DNA of News. Understanding Incidental and Serendipitous Mobile News Consumption
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Digital Journalism, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/21670811.2019.1655461 |
| Authors |
Kristin Van Damme, Marijn Martens, Sarah Van Leuven, Mariek Vanden Abeele, Lieven De Marez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 4 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 20 | 37% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,109,070
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Digital Journalism
#130
of 815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,404
of 341,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digital Journalism
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.