| Title |
Preparation of nanoparticles by continuous-flow microfluidics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-007-9340-5 |
| Authors |
Andreas Jahn, Joseph E. Reiner, Wyatt N. Vreeland, Don L. DeVoe, Laurie E. Locascio, Michael Gaitan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| India | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 395 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 110 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 80 | 19% |
| Researcher | 59 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 10% |
| Unknown | 73 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 95 | 23% |
| Chemistry | 81 | 19% |
| Chemical Engineering | 32 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 80 | 19% |
| Unknown | 82 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,526,963
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#17
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,087
of 178,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.