↓ Skip to main content

Recent Advances in the Epidemiologic Investigation of Risk Factors for Asthma: A Review of the 2011 Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Recent Advances in the Epidemiologic Investigation of Risk Factors for Asthma: A Review of the 2011 Literature
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11882-012-0254-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josep M. Antó

Abstract

The present review aims to identify and summarize epidemiologic investigations published during 2011 on the environmental risk factors for asthma. Potentially eligible papers were identified by a MEDLINE search. In total, 1,130 items were retrieved. Based on a broad definition of environment, the following topics were included: obesity, diet, vitamin D, air pollution, farming environment, and social factors. Some of the more relevant contributions included evidence that 1) obesity precedes asthma, 2) fruit consumption is longitudinally associated with a lower risk of asthma and atopy, 3) a comprehensive statewide smoking ban was followed by a reduction in hospital admissions for asthma, 4) asthma is one of the diseases showing the largest burdens due to environmental tobacco smoke, 5) traffic-related urban air pollution is associated with bronchial inflammation as measured by fractional exhaled nitric oxide and uncontrolled asthma, 6) aeroallergens and desert dust may contribute to the short-term effects of air pollution and asthma, and 7) maternal exposure to air pollution before and during pregnancy may alter the immune competence in offspring.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 151 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Environmental Science 8 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 42 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,242,707
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#565
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,283
of 158,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.