↓ Skip to main content

Methods for rearing ground-nesting bees under laboratory conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Apidologie, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Methods for rearing ground-nesting bees under laboratory conditions
Published in
Apidologie, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13592-019-00679-8
Authors

Ryan J. Leonard, Alexandra N. Harmon-Threatt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Researcher 5 7%
Professor 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 46%
Environmental Science 11 16%
Unspecified 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,578,413
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Apidologie
#622
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,713
of 312,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Apidologie
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.