| Title |
Current Treatments of Isolated Articular Cartilage Lesions of the Knee Achieve Similar Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2304-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
HongChul Lim, JiHoon Bae, SangHeon Song, YoungEun Park, SeungJu Kim |
| Abstract |
Many surgical techniques, including microfracture, periosteal and perichondral grafts, chondrocyte transplantation, and osteochondral grafts, have been studied in an attempt to restore damaged articular cartilage. However, there is no consensus regarding the best method to repair isolated articular cartilage defects of the knee. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Colombia | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 15% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 48 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2012.
All research outputs
#4,646,256
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#991
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,092
of 170,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#13
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.