↓ Skip to main content

Sleeping Beauty mutagenesis reveals cooperating mutations and pathways in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sleeping Beauty mutagenesis reveals cooperating mutations and pathways in pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1202490109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen M. Mann, Jerrold M. Ward, Christopher Chin Kuan Yew, Anne Kovochich, David W. Dawson, Michael A. Black, Benjamin T. Brett, Todd E. Sheetz, Adam J. Dupuy, David K. Chang, Andrew V. Biankin, Nicola Waddell, Karin S. Kassahn, Sean M. Grimmond, Alistair G. Rust, David J. Adams, Nancy A. Jenkins, Neal G. Copeland

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most deadly cancers affecting the Western world. Because the disease is highly metastatic and difficult to diagnosis until late stages, the 5-y survival rate is around 5%. The identification of molecular cancer drivers is critical for furthering our understanding of the disease and development of improved diagnostic tools and therapeutics. We have conducted a mutagenic screen using Sleeping Beauty (SB) in mice to identify new candidate cancer genes in pancreatic cancer. By combining SB with an oncogenic Kras allele, we observed highly metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Using two independent statistical methods to identify loci commonly mutated by SB in these tumors, we identified 681 loci that comprise 543 candidate cancer genes (CCGs); 75 of these CCGs, including Mll3 and Ptk2, have known mutations in human pancreatic cancer. We identified point mutations in human pancreatic patient samples for another 11 CCGs, including Acvr2a and Map2k4. Importantly, 10% of the CCGs are involved in chromatin remodeling, including Arid4b, Kdm6a, and Nsd3, and all SB tumors have at least one mutated gene involved in this process; 20 CCGs, including Ctnnd1, Fbxo11, and Vgll4, are also significantly associated with poor patient survival. SB mutagenesis provides a rich resource of mutations in potential cancer drivers for cross-comparative analyses with ongoing sequencing efforts in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
France 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 178 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 22%
Researcher 40 21%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 28 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,399,732
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#43,124
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,199
of 160,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#378
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.