↓ Skip to main content

Apnea of prematurity: from cause to treatment

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
392 Mendeley
Title
Apnea of prematurity: from cause to treatment
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00431-011-1409-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Zhao, Fernando Gonzalez, Dezhi Mu

Abstract

Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is a common problem affecting premature infants, likely secondary to a "physiologic" immaturity of respiratory control that may be exacerbated by neonatal disease. These include altered ventilatory responses to hypoxia, hypercapnia, and altered sleep states, while the roles of gastroesophageal reflux and anemia remain controversial. Standard clinical management of the obstructive subtype of AOP includes prone positioning and continuous positive or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation to prevent pharyngeal collapse and alveolar atelectasis, while methylxanthine therapy is a mainstay of treatment of central apnea by stimulating the central nervous system and respiratory muscle function. Other therapies, including kangaroo care, red blood cell transfusions, and CO(2) inhalation, require further study. The physiology and pathophysiology behind AOP are discussed, including the laryngeal chemoreflex and sensitivity to inhibitory neurotransmitters, as are the mechanisms by which different therapies may work and the potential long-term neurodevelopmental consequences of AOP and its treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 387 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 58 15%
Student > Master 52 13%
Researcher 37 9%
Student > Postgraduate 35 9%
Other 28 7%
Other 82 21%
Unknown 100 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 164 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 9%
Engineering 25 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 2%
Other 35 9%
Unknown 111 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,880,982
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,092
of 4,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,518
of 195,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.